But how about everyone who does not buy sonos because of this? Those voices are unheard and who knows how many people they consist of 🤷🏼♂️ Right now it’s a small portion of the SONOS users. It would add usecases to expand the userbase actually.Also, as soon as other speakers are added you simply add delay. It would solve all lip sync threads from people who only have 1 device.
It’s super user friendly actually to have no delay in standalone mode.If Sonos is not made for external instruments, why have a line in? If you want line in only for streaming purpose with delay, there is a Sonos Port for that.Denon heos/Home allows for standalone use with AUX input and only adds delay when grouping for stereo or other rooms.Only a very small portion of the users would use this.Removing the delay would add complexity and not be user friendly.The delay has to be there per design and cannot be removed.I know the arguments of people defending Sonos: It forces me to have an extra pair of Yamaha hs7 at hand, while I’d rather get an Sonos Five instead. The minimum of 50-75ms delay in standalone usage for the Sonos Amp and Five is completely unnecessary. It exists, but I’d have to leave Sonos and go for Denon. I’ve spent literally hours searching for the best speaker setup for casual multiroom usage and some small birthday dancing and an input for live instruments. Such as a drum machine and other stuff I own. But 2/10 times I want to use Sonos for live instrument playback. Why does there have to be a delay when using Sonos (Five or Amp for example, I’ve owned both) in standalone mode?Ĩ/10 times my usecase for Sonos is casual listening via streaming services. So, I know this topic has been discussed a gazillion times already.
0 kommentar(er)
